STORM Δ MOTORS' PowerCode™ as an ultimative fuel saver
STORM Δ MOTORS' ™ provides an unique hyper ionization technology for servicing and tuning of an used and brand new engine of a vehicle, that get an unique consumption (fuel economy) and performance (energy efficiency). The PowerCode™ was in the test as a main fuel saving agent.
Following are showing the test results of the technology on main car manufacturers and their performance characteristics after apply of one of few STORM´ products (technologies) .
Why should you use PowerCode™
- up to 15% savings on fuel consumption ( guaranteed! )
- 15% – 30% reduction in CARBON emissions.
- 25% – 35% reduction in HC emissions.
- Reduced engine vibrations and improved performance.
- Rapid return on investment.
- No alternations to the engine or the fuel line.
- Simple one time installation.
- Environmentally friendly.
APPLICATION
-
This product is suitable for any type of Car, Van, Boat, Bus or Generator.
-
It is equally effective for unleaded, leaded, diesel and LPG fuel.
| Test Results |
|
|
Tests have been carried out in laboratories in accordance to the rules and regulations valid in the countries of the European Community, based on the DIN/ISO norms as used in the testing facilities.
Several tests have been conducted on specialised independent test benches. Tests were conducted on a wide spectrum of older and newer cars.
The values before and after are to be understood as before and after mounting (apply) the STORM´s technology
| Test 1 |
Mercedes |
| Make / Model: |
C 180 Classic |
| Month / Year |
1998 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
67,253 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
68,461 |
| Miles covered during test: |
1208 |
| Terrain used: |
High-way |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.68 |
| After: |
0.46 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
17.8 |
| After: |
14.6 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test–result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 17.6% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 32% |
| Test 2 |
AUDI |
| Make / Model: |
A4, 2TDi |
| Month / Year |
2002 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
23,320 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
23,765 |
| Miles covered during test: |
445 |
| Terrain used: |
High-way |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.49 |
| After: |
0.40 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
19.3 |
| After: |
15.7 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 18.2% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 17% |
| Test 3 |
BMW Video |
| Make / Model: |
318i |
| Month / Year |
1995 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
89,189 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
91,124 |
| Miles covered during test: |
1935 |
| Terrain used: |
City |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.78 |
| After: |
0.60 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
17.9 |
| After: |
14.3 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 19.7% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 22% |
| Test 4 |
CITROEN |
| Make / Model: |
Xantia 1.9LX |
| Month / Year |
1998 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
48,576 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
49,317 |
| Miles covered during test: |
741 |
| Terrain used: |
High-way |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.63 |
| After: |
0.54 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
17.8 |
| After: |
14.6 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 17.5% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 14% |
| Test 5 |
FORD |
| Make / Model: |
Escort 1.8 GTi |
| Month / Year |
1998 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
59,393 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
59,861 |
| Miles covered during test: |
468 |
| Terrain used: |
Mixed |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.71 |
| After: |
0.56 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
16.0 |
| After: |
13.6 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 14.8% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 20% |
| Test 6 |
HYUNDAI |
| Make / Model: |
Lantra 1.6 GLX |
| Month / Year |
1994 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
104,756 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
105,277 |
| Miles covered during test: |
521 |
| Terrain used: |
City |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.62 |
| After: |
0.48 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
15.0 |
| After: |
12.6 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 15.6% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 21% |
| Test 7 |
LAND ROVER |
| Make / Model: |
Discovery 2.5 TDi |
| Month / Year |
1999 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
57,468 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
58,451 |
| Miles covered during test: |
983 |
| Terrain used: |
City |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.67 |
| After: |
0.46 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
26.6 |
| After: |
22.9 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 13.7% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 31% |
| Test 8 |
HONDA |
| Make / Model: |
Accord 2.0 V-Tec |
| Month / Year |
2001 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
54,182 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
54,991 |
| Miles covered during test: |
809 |
| Terrain used: |
High-way |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.58 |
| After: |
0.44 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
19.0 |
| After: |
14.9 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 21.6% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 23% |
| Test 9 |
MAZDA |
| Make / Model: |
MX5 1.8Si |
| Month / Year |
2000 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
114,123 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
114,876 |
| Miles covered during test: |
753 |
| Terrain used: |
Mixed |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.62 |
| After: |
0.50 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
18.7 |
| After: |
15.4 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 17.3% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 19% |
| Test 10 |
NISSAN |
| Make / Model: |
Primera 2.0 LX |
| Month / Year |
1998 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
93,384 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
94,327 |
| Miles covered during test: |
943 |
| Terrain used: |
City |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.77 |
| After: |
0.50 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
19.1 |
| After: |
15.9 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 16.5% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 34% |
| Test 11 |
VOLVO |
| Make / Model: |
S40 1.8 |
| Month / Year |
1998 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
82,764 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
83,685 |
| Miles covered during test: |
921 |
| Terrain used: |
High-way |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.66 |
| After: |
0.46 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
21.0 |
| After: |
17.2 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 18% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 29% |
| Test 12 |
TOYOTA |
| Make / Model: |
Avensis 1.8 GS |
| Month / Year |
1999 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
68,495 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
68,818 |
| Miles covered during test: |
323 |
| Terrain used: |
Mixed |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.44 |
| After: |
0.33 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
17.3 |
| After: |
14.2 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 18% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 23% |
|
© 2008 ÷ 2025 STORM Δ MOTORS ™ an Engine Tuning Company a subsidiary of STORM Research Labs.
|
